Corexit’s Foul Stench

We have been reporting (and reporting about) the dangers of Corexit since the beginning of its use in the BP Gulf Disaster. Amongst things that we at Protect The Ocean have noticed is that Corexit is detectable in significant concentrations within shoreline waters days ahead of the arrival of the oil itself, and in beach waters that show no sign of oil contamination. Corexit is lethal to fish fry within 96 hours (and the stuff has been in there a lot longer than 96 hours) at just 2.6 ppm, that’s a pretty serious concentration! The fact is that far lower concentrations have proven lethal on fish fry when the duration went to 2 weeks.

A local Channel 5 news station at the Gulf did some independent testing. They took samples of water that children were playing in, and found Corexit solvents in concentrations ranging from 16 ppm to well over 200 ppm. Needless to say, I wouldn’t want anything in (or from) those waters if it could be helped. There’s no doubt that employing Corexit to bury the oil beneath the surface (where they wouldn’t be forced to pay for cleaning it up) was their contingency plan in case of major catastrophic leak. There’s little doubt that they realized the potential ramifications of infusing the stuff at 133+ atmospheres of pressure in cold water. Read more


BP and the EPA Working in Symphony to Cover Up the Oil Spill?

Oil Spill Photos

From the very beginning, BP has been less than forthright about the damages and potential damages from the oil spewing out of the hole in the earth’s crust some 5000 feet below sea level and 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana. 

From the very beginning, they have been arbitrarily underestimating the quantity of oil leaking from the exploded rig. 

From the very beginning, they have been plotting to sweep the majority of the mess under the saltwater carpet.  But how do you do that?  With very careful, very clever planning, and a little help from some friends at the Environmental Protection Agency.

Early on, BP began spraying and injecting solvents into offshore waters.  They claimed that dispersing the oil would be a good idea, better for the wetlands.  Even then, their plot was in place.  They knew that the truth was that the solvents would make the oil exponentially more toxic, (as would adding the solvent itself) but that didn’t matter.  Dispersal solvents would see to it that a large portion of that oil never floated to the top or showed up at the shoreline.  Why would they do that?  Simple enough: If it doesn’t rise to the surface or wash up onto the shores, BP doesn’t have to pay to clean it up. Read more


Gulf Oil Spill: Huge 10-mile Long Oil Plumes Found Under Gulf’s Surface!

Another BP Cover-up

Saturday,  Jeffrey Collins (AP) reported that researchers from the National Institute for Undersea Science and Technology has detected massive 10 mile long underwater plumes of oil at depths between just below the surface and more than 4,000 feet deep.  The existence of such plumes serves to verify and validate our concerns that BP’s disaster management methods were aimed at keeping the leaked oil under the surface.  Once the oil was out of sight, BP hoped they would not be held accountable for the cost of cleaning up those millions of gallons of toxic oil which never made it to shore.

The incriminating AP story was short-lived on several sources.   Just a few short hours later, those very same links had been changed to BP’s reporting some success with their latest attempt to capture oil spilling from the damaged line.  Though we don’t want to seem like conspiracy theorists, we’ve lost count of how many times and ways BP has attempted to change their story, hide the truth, and dupe the public.  (Check earlier posts here for some of their more infamous fiascos.)

Since they’re trying to bury the story of these sub-surface streams, we’ll bring the news to you:

Read more